No. 19-7499

Susan Skipp v. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 1st-amendment 9th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-amendments discrimination due-process equal-protection fatherhood-initiative federal-funding multi-agency-agreement state-action
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the implemented Section 17b-27a - John S. Martinez Fatherhood Initiative, Objectives, Reports, Funding, Grant program, programming and tenacle(d) it through the State of Connecticut liaisons agencies contravene any of the First Ninth, Tenth, or Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Does the implemented Section 17b-27a John S. Martinez Fatherhood Initiative, Objectives, Reports, Funding, Grant program, programming and tenacle(d) it through the State of Connecticut liaisons agencies contravene any of the First Ninth, Tenth, or Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution? (2) Does tentacle(d) Fatherhood programs Multi-Agency Agreement Contract 2010 titled MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JUDICAL BRANCH, COURT SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION, JUDICIAL BRANCH, SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICES contravene any of the First Ninth, Tenth, or Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution? (3) Does the implemented Fatherhood programs Multi-Agency Agreement Contract 2010 titled MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JUDICAL BRANCH, COURT SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION, JUDICIAL BRANCH, SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICES contravene ARTICLE XXI.Article fifth of the amendments to the constitution is amended to read as follows: No person shall be denied the equal protection of the law nor be subjected to segregation or discrimination in the exercise or enjoyment of his or her civil or political rights because of... sex... disability? (4) Does the implemented Section 17b-27a John S. Martinez Fatherhood with tentacle(d) Fatherhood programs Multi-Agency Agreement Contract 2010 titled MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JUDICAL BRANCH, COURT SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION, JUDICIAL BRANCH, SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICES Initiative law violate of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, which forbids discrimination in a contractual relationship? 2

Docket Entries

2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-02-04
Waiver of right of respondents State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut Attorney General William Tong to respond filed.
2020-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)

Attorneys

State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut Attorney General William Tong
Mark Francis KohlerOffice of the Atty. Gene. CT, Respondent
Mark Francis KohlerOffice of the Atty. Gene. CT, Respondent
Susan Skipp
Susan Skipp — Petitioner
Susan Skipp — Petitioner