Frank Deville, et ux. v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess
What is the liberal ability to amend a complaint?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED With one attempt to amend a complaint is that sufficient liberal ability to amend? What is fraud particularity? May hearsay be admitted as evidence in the court of law? Concealing or suppressing material facts ; is that legal? According to law there should be liberal ability to amend (Roland v. ; Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108, 112) Truth is not what we believe it to be. Truth is what the law says is truth. Its not about our truth or the defendants truth or the judges truth but the truth of the law. Any unlawful activity in any business activity that is forbidden by law. (saunders v. Superior court 27 CAL. App 4" 832, 838-839). ; The case set here now is indeed unique, a the highest state court has rendered a decision of an important federal question of federal law has not been but should be, settled by this court 28 U.S.C. 451.There is indeed a conflict of law that do exist. The petitioners constitutional due process : rights have been violated, he hasbeen denied the right to be heard and to have a fair hearing. / . . i