Whether the Virginia Supreme Court erred in its rulings on ineffective assistance of counsel claims

No question identified. : oe _ TT, Id. Did the Virginia Supreme Covet err _in deciding that counsels, lla; 4 to Adequate ote 13@ Pe: tione. OT tne necessar | p ment neece 2 Cd vie hiv, tals NO ineder ‘ve jesishowe of consel Z Nid the Virginia wacene Up att MW Aecidin Na OU a ea re to ex de. the vetim dering the sreliming hearing wa nat ineflective assisdan @ at 0 nsel Z 3. Didthe Vigna Supueme Cour er vn desig Laat counsels fuilore to Sappecess Sydnee, brown's testimony Was nat neice assistance at counsel 2 : | 4. Did the Vigna Supt Cnchentin deciding th conasels Lilace in sever betitioner’s drial fram thadoft his codefendants Was not inethective assistance of counsel 7 | 5. Nid the Virgnia Supreme, Covet en in deciding Wat counsels | aul la l inv t 4; lioness h lao nedbective asi tan nsel | | | ‘| I — ___—eaXaommm esi onsen gee ‘STATEMENT o& THE CASE | A. Reg esttoc hi ll of bacticulars ———fage, f _ CaSapuessinn of ideatifiatina widewss Pages Se sD Severance off deals _fage, @ ‘| I a 0 INDEY To_ APPENDICES, | aoe NOLA 2 | Decision o€ Virginia Suoreme, ‘act | enying Review | AMPENIN AB [ Order ot Vireinia Svaceme Couct Denying Rehearing | TABLE OF AVTHORETLE: | al Cr) AALS RULES | ivginie, Lode, (1,2 -Z2G2 tayo iz | cl AgssoOn OCGA 0 Dla) Paw g h | Herrandez-Gverrero _y. Commo weal p Va,Aoo. Slo fase, 10 | et Piagers, 407 VS, 18% ee 14 [} . mit) Lommonwealth, 2: a, 72 tage 44 OTHER QURCE MATEKLP [ , + mA bre “ce y hmina by cedure '2 Done igh v A of vider R y te fa Q A | ete di q (On a. Coase vn Vicars B:30 ace, 10 | Virginie sui ot Evidence 2.4 2 Page 42 | NO. | | TE | SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTTENSTATES | | | | is | | — | Hacald W,Clache Nirector VDOC ~ RESPONDENT | | | | Poritioner re spect (I plays thet o weit of jpn issu@ to review the tudamert below. | | ei [he 2pinian of the “gee 5 vpceme, Couch doted | ' uly 17 2019 appears at Kopendix A to thi petition. Sr 16 2014 GpAgdacs a Aypendi PS ty this Ne tion : These. ocdecs were of ae: ignated foc publishing. | | The date. on which tne nin Sapeome Court ided ra ~ wa eto 6,201 rs d rere ath Cet “ mae tee | | TSTINS TNVOLYE:! | llunzn SS STATES CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDS TV: | » person Shall he held +o -an er tor o rital or otherwise intamovs Cri 7 less 6 sresentme tor indictment of a orand | except iv 23€8, arisi van the land or Naval forces or inthe Militia when ™ actug| secvi tin Wat i ren get” ‘a any _serson he subject Lor the same offense to be twig Lok in i@olardy ot lite. 6 limb necshall he. compelled in | criminal case the a witness again imself nor he deprived of Ife, Liberty oc propecty * witht due. process Ww c shall private pro ob taken 2 ) I; & witout pst camsensaio : lourten : ONSTITUTIONAL AMEND NT VI. l n_oll criminal prosecutions the accused hall e a the right to a speed tal and public trial by an i sartia | ory ot the stote and distvct where the rime | ha Vv mms which distect shall hav | bee previous | erte nw andl / eee | Me notyre ancl Ca 0 the ACL ation 0 howe land » have the assistance, of counsel foc his defense. | tu LTED STATES CONSTETUTIONAL AMENDMENT X TV. | All persons born or necturalized in the United res eee { subect to the jucisdiction thewot, are citizens at ey ate shall make of enbre any law which shal abides the privileges ac immunities 0 citize ot ne | aztec Stat, 4 ne hal an stodes dearive a L250N_e | te liberty oc peoperty, witht due. process o . he ae +p any Nerso iThin_( mia) di tio the leg al grotection of the law. hs _ _ll ONSTITUTION OF VIRGINIA Acticle TF Section @ | That in_eciminal peosecution s aman hath o cight rto demand the cause and nature ot Nis accusation —2 Ihe ond conted with the accusers and witnesses, and th all foc evidence in his tavor and he shall enjoy the | aht te a peedy ana public teed by aa imple choad : F Q his (i Cinage withou Whos e.wne imMous..CONSE 4 The nvot be trond guilty. He shall not be deprive of | life. ocliherly, except by the law ofthe land acthe I ude ent ot his flees noche compelled in any ¢ nine |