Whether the Fourth Amendment requirement of reasonableness requires that a determination of reasonable suspicion be based upon an explicit identification of inculpatory and exculpatory circumstances and explication of the reasonable inferences which may be drawn from a holistic synthesis and reconciliation of the foregoing to arrive at a determination of whether an agent would reasonably perceive that a crime had been or was being committed and that the particular individual to be stopped had committed it

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Fourth Amendment requirement of reasonableness requires that a determination of reasonable suspicion be based upon an explicit identification of ant inculpatory and exculpatory circumstances and explication of the reasonable inferences which may be drawn from a holistic synthesis and reconciliation of the foregoing to arrive at a determination of whether an agent would reasonably perceive that a crime had been or was being committed and that the particular individual to be stopped had committed it. Whether Petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the District Court’s denial of heiir Motion to Suppress based upon its failure to examine evidence collectively known to law enforcement officers which tended to negate suspicion or neutralize otherwise suspicious circumstances. ii