Whether the district court lacked jurisdiction over evidence of foreign drug smuggling and whether the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rendered a decision in conflict with this Court and other Courts of Appeals

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT LACKED "JURISDICTION" OVER EVIDENCE OF FOREIGN DRUG SMUGGLING: AND WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURTCOF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RENDERED A DECISION IN CONFLICT OF THIS COURT AND OTHER COURT OF APPEALS; 2) WHETHER TRIAL COUNSEL"S OBJECTION PRESERVED REVIEW OF THE PROSECUTION"S CLEAR ERROR IN QUESTIONING AGENT BUSS; 3) WHETHER THAT REMAND OF SITZMANN*S IAC CLAIMS IS MERITED? PARTIES THE PETITIONER IS GREGORY JOEL SITZMANN, WHICH IS PRESENTING THIS WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN PROPRIA PERSONA (PRO SE), WHOiIS CURRENTLY SERVING HIS SENTENCE IN THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS. THE RESPONDENTS ARE GRIFFITH AND KATSAS, CIRCUIT JUDGES: EDWARDS : SENIOR CIRCUIT JUDGE FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. (i)