No. 19-7530
Orando Ricardo Thompson v. Florida
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process fairness fundamental-unfairness ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-precedent outcome prejudice sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-review
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and its progeny adequately allows consideration of the fundamental unfairness of a trial absent a showing of a reasonable probability of a different outcome
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and its progeny . which establishes review of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, adequately allows consideration of the fundamental unfairness of a trial absent a showing of a reasonable probability of a different outcome. ‘ i. PARTIES WHOSE JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT TO BE REVIEWED , _ AND
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Florida
Orando Ricardo Thompson
Orando Ricardo Thompson — Petitioner