No. 19-7534
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights coram-nobis disclosure-violations due-process evidence-disclosure evidence-suppression judicial-jurisdiction kyles-v-whitley police-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Arkansas Supreme Court's refusal to re-invest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider petitioner Scott's petition for writ of error coram nobis impermissibly frustrated his right to develop support for his numerous claims of Brady disclosure violations, violating his right to due process of law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WHETHER THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT’S REFUSAL TO REINVEST JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT TO CONSIDER PETITIONER SCOTT’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS IMPERMISSIBLY FRUSTRATED HIS RIGHT TO DEVELOP SUPPORT FOR HIS NUMEROUS CLAIMS OF BRADY DISCLOSURE VIOLATIONS, VIOLATING HIS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW. i
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent State of Arkansas to respond filed.
2020-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Ricky Scott
J. Thomas Sullivan — Petitioner
State of Arkansas