Donald Alexander Spice v. Michigan
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether MOR 5.433(c)(3) is unconstitutional as it violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the mandates of the United States Supreme Court, requiring states to furnish transcripts to indigent defendants for use on appeal, upon request?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Page: QUESTION T 10 WHETHER MOR 5.433{C}(3) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ag TT VIOLATES THE EQUAL, PROTECYTON AND DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE POURTEENTY AMENDMENT AND THE MANDATES OF THE UNTSED STATES SUPREME COURT, REQUIRING STATES TO FURNTSH TRANSCRIPTS TO INDIGENT DEFENDANTS FOR USE ON APPEAL, UPON REQUEST? "QUESTION It 17 WHETHER TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING SPICE ACCESS TO THE TRANSCRIPTS, WHEN SPICE SHOWED GOOD CAUSE? | QUESTION TIT 18 CONSTITUTION UNOEBR THE FIRST AND FOURTSENTH AMENDMENT, BY ACTIONS OF THE . poo ¢ . ‘ , . Pages