No. 19-7541
Richard Hurles v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 8th-amendment capital-punishment death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias judicial-ethics recusal right-to-fair-trial
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments violated where a judge who has personally litigated against a defendant in the same case presides over his trial and sentences him to death?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Are the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments violated where a judge who has personally litigated against a defendant in the same case presides over his trial and sentences him to death? ii
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-05
Brief of respondent David Shinn in opposition filed.
2020-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2020)
2019-11-15
Application (19A535) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 18, 2020.
2019-11-08
Application (19A535) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 19, 2019 to January 18, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
David Shinn
Lacey Stover Gard — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Lacey Stover Gard — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent