Whether the Supreme Court should eliminate the requirement for an individualized, fact-specific determination regarding the availability of administrative remedies?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L Zn Blake v Ross, 136 S.Cb. 1850, Pid The United Sfatec Supreme, Cour} Eliminate The Requirement For An Individualized, Fact Specific Pererminatlon Regarding The Avol lability of Administrative Renedier ? a. Ds An Administrative Remedy Available Te A Mentally Handicapped Privcner tLdIhen The De partitent OF Correttion Falis TS Provide Ascietonce Mandated By wrt Own Adululstrative Directive ? 3. Are The De partment Of Corrections’ s$afF Req ulred Ta Assist Tm paired or. Disabled Knmoates To Ensure Ad wialstvative. Remedies Ave “Accessible” And “Capable of USe" Far The Prisoner Te “Obtain Relief”? 4. Ils An Tnmete Reculived To Present Ex eet bditness Evidence’ On His Meatal oe Pr Coadiiien then He Pointed To Wis Treatment Records At The Prison, In order Ts Survive A Motion Fer Summary dudgment ?