No. 19-7545
Willie Palmer v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment abandonment effective-assistance-of-counsel evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance jury-instruction jury-instructions postconviction-relief rule-3.850 sixth-amendment unreasonable-determination-of-facts
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the courts below decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the relevant decisions of this Honorable Court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Whether the courts below decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the relevant decisions of this Honorable Court when they denied -without an evidentiary hearing -Petitioner's Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief alleging Petitioner was denied his six amendment right to effective assistance of counsel for failing to request a special jury instruction on abandonment, all based on an unreasonable determination of the Facts. i . y
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Inch, Sec., FL DOC, et al. to respond filed.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2020)