Roger Hillygus v. Frances Doherty, et al.
DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy
Did the trial court err when it dismissed with prejudice all of Plaintiffs' claims under 42 USC § 1983 when Plaintiff Roger Hillygus has suffered false arrests?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the trial court err when it dismissed with prejudice all of Plaintiffs’ claims under 42 USC § 1983 when Plaintiff Roger Hillygus has suffered false arrests? _ 2. Did the trial court err when it dismissed with prejudice Plaintiffs’ claims against the Private Professional Guardian and her employees when they illegally isolated, drugged, kidnapped, and human trafficked Susan Hillygus through a fraudulent Guardianship case, Stole firearms belonging to Mr. Roger Hillygus, through perjured testimony locked Mr. Hillygus out of the trust ; residence, broke a vested land trust selling the Family Residence for invoices due to the lawyers, summarily terminated his Powers of Attorney for Property and Health Care all without due process, notice or trial, and then violated a deed and trust filed with the county. oe 3. Did the Trial Court erred when it dismissed the Original, First and Second Amended Complaints for failure to be “clear and concise”? 4. Did the Ninth Circuit Court Erred when it dismissed each and every Petition for a Fee Waiver after the court requested and received the Petitions regarding the petitioner’s indigent status and. disability. , ~ii~ * % a a . B.