No. 19-7566
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights commerce-clause criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction interstate-commerce predicate-acts racketeering rico rico-prosecution substantial-effect
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal jurisdiction exists in a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) where neither the activities of the alleged enterprise nor the individual predicate racketeering acts have a substantial effect on interstate commerce
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether federal jurisdiction exists in a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) where neither the activities of the alleged enterprise nor the individual predicate racketeering acts have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. --prefix-
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Javed Asefi
Timothy Allen Scott — Scott Trial Lawyers, APC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent