No. 19-7573
Sean M. Donahue v. Eugene Scalia, Secretary of Labor, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-jurisdiction due-process federal-courts jobs-for-veterans-act standing statutory-enforcement statutory-interpretation veterans-affairs veterans-employment-rights veterans-preference-act void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the appropriate enforcement mechanism for 38 U.S.C. §4215?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . : -. Question I. WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM FOR 38 U.S.C. §4215? SUGGESTED ANSWER: US DISTRICT COURT Question I]. WHAT IS THE NEXT BEST ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM ABSENT THE US DISTRICT COURT? : oe SUGGESTED ANSWER: STATE TRIAL COURTS Question III. SHOULD A STATUTE SHORT OF AN ENFORCEMENT 0 MECHANISM BE STRUCK UNDER THE VOID FOR VAGUENESS DOCTRINE? ~ SUGGESTED ANSWER: YES . Preface Page 1 :
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-06
Waiver of right of respondents Scalia, Eugene, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2020)
2020-01-22
Application (19A812) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 15, 2020.
2020-01-10
Application (19A812) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 15, 2020 to March 15, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Scalia, Eugene, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent