No. 19-7579
Philip G. Barry v. Thomas Perkins, et ux.
IFP
Tags: automatic-stay bankruptcy-code bankruptcy-courts bankruptcy-jurisdiction bankruptcy-law federal-jurisdiction rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-judgment state-court-judgments void-ab-initio
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the so-called 'Rooker-Feldman Doctrine' strips bankruptcy and other lower federal courts of jurisdiction to avoid or otherwise declare a state court judgment void ab initio upon a finding that the state court action was taken in violation of the United States Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay provisions (11 U.S.C. §362(a))
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the so-called "Rooker-Feldman Doctrine" strips . _ “bankruptcy and other lower federal courts of jurisdiction to avoid or otherwise declare a state court judgment void ab initio upon a finding that the state court action was taken in violation of the United States Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay provisions. (11 U.S.C. §362(a)). i Ci)
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2020)