No. 19-7599
Tracey Smith-Kilpatrick v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: business-records confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington evidence-rule federal-rule-of-evidence-803(6) federal-rules-of-evidence government-use hearsay hearsay-exception record-reliability sixth-circuit testimonial-statement testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether business records qualify as inadmissible hearsay
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether business records qualify as inadmissible hearsay when the government uses them as testimonial statements and for purposes other than those for which they were prepared, such that they no longer carry the assumed reliability of business-purpose records for admission under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6). i
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Tracey Smith-Kilpatrick
Scott Graham — Scott Graham PLLC, Petitioner
Scott Graham — Scott Graham PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent