Does this oppressive conduct and reckless defiance of elementary standards of justice and fair play, with the specific and purposeful intent to defraud or injure a pro se litigant, effectively depriving pro se litigants of the substantial rights of due-process, equal-protection, full-access-to-the-court, and the right-to-be-secured-in-one's-papers as well as, in Sundy's specific case, private-property-without-just-compensation, raise the issue of judicial-and-or-equitable-estoppel?

QUESTION PRESENTED State of Georgia court officers have demonstrated a collective and relentless practice of knowingly removing or concealing documents and information from the records of official court proceedings of select pro se litigants, in violation of the Ninth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as falsely adding information to the record, mischaracterizing pleadings, failing to docket a transferred case, and otherwise causing the record of proceedings of select litigant’s to be inaccurate or incomplete, tampering with official records with the specific intent to defraud or injure the litigant and/or to alter the outcome of an official proceeding. Does this . oppressive conduct and reckless defiance of elementary standards of justice and fair play, with the specific and purposeful intent to defraud or injure a pro se litigant, effectively depriving pro se litigants of the substantial rights of due process, equal protection, full access to the court, and the right to be secured in one’s papers as well as, in Sundy’s specific case, private property without just compensation, raise the issue of judicial and/or equitable estoppel? . i