No. 19-7601
Craig K. Garrett v. Joseph Madder, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure digital-privacy due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-enforcement probable-cause prosecutorial-misconduct public-defender right-to-counsel search-and-seizure state-attorney
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the state of Colorado remove a defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel (trial and appellate) and use of a public defender due to prosecutorial misconduct?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Oo (\ Cau the sll of Crlorsd emote i A Suabevel Sy Het Hat ende-s c “ole beret Wweffechve fssistisce oF Covesel Ctrial ancl Ageeliute)) Amol USE | | | Prosecetey piscendyet Ke a ee a wero hel COmvic tosis) ° oe | | (2) Cas the sheles Teblic Defeodey Ss office : Getta bbovate Udh Stte's Disha et Mersey s fice fo Comet tse gout a ole(erdaots © .
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2019-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2020)
Attorneys
Craig K. Garrett
Craig K. Garrett — Petitioner