Does statutory tolling as described in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) and (D) permit a petitioner's direct filing of second 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DOES STATUTORY TOLLING AS DESCRIBED IN 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) AND (D) PERMIT A PETITIONER’S DIRECT FILING OF SECOND 28 U.S.C. § 2254 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT? 2. DOES EQUITABLE TOLLING DOCTRINE ANNOUNCED IN HOLLAND ¥. FLORIDA, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) APPLY IN 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) ISSUE WHERE | STATE AGENT IMPEDED A PETITIONER’S FILING OF A FEDERAL APPLICATION BY COMMITTING EXTRINSIC FRAUD ON THE COURT? 3. DOES STATUTORY TOLLING AS DESCRIBED IN 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) AND (D) APPLY TO CASE WHERE STATE COURT’S DEFAULT OF LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION CLAIM COMPELLED A PETITIONER’S FILING OF ISSUE IN FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PETITION? ii