No. 19-7616

Fred Blajos v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-2255 bank-robbery career-offender career-offender-guideline crime-of-violence elements-clause habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause section-2255 timeliness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker career offender guideline, asserts a 'right . . . initially recognized' in Johnson for timeliness purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented 1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker career offender guideline, asserts a “right . . . initially recognized” in Johnson for timeliness purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3). 2. Whether federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) be a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), where the offense fails to require any intentional use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force? i Statement of

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2020)

Attorneys

Fred Blajos
Brianna Fuller MircheffOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent