No. 19-7623

Sinyo Silkeutsabay, et al. v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cannabis-regulation civil-rights controlled-substances court-of-appeals district-court due-process federal-preemption federal-response medical-marijuana state-law state-legalization washington-marijuana-laws washington-state-law
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Courts below err in their analysis of Washington State law governing growing and selling medical marijuana?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Courts below err in their analysis of Washington State law governing growing and selling medical marijuana? i

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 12, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixCertificate of Word Count

Attorneys

Sinyo Silkeutsabay, et al.
Peter S. Schweda — Waldo Schweda & Montgomery PS, Petitioner
Peter S. Schweda — Waldo Schweda & Montgomery PS, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent