No. 19-7626
IFP
Tags: cruel-and-unusual-punishment disproportionate-sentences due-process eighth-amendment non-violent-offense non-violent-offenses proportionality-review sentencing sentencing-disparity
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is sentencing a defendant to a de facto life sentence for non-violent offenses a violation of the Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Is sentencing a defendant to a de facto life sentence for non-violent offenses fall _ within a violation of the eight amendment right of cruel and unusual punishment. Does sentencing a defendant under the wrong case number amount to a violation of . due process. Is giving a defendant a sentence of two and a half times harsher than other ae defendants who committed the same crimes in the same jurisdiction amount to : grossly disproportionate sentences. A violation of the Eighth Amendment. .
Docket Entries
2020-04-21
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2020-03-03
Motion of petitioner to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 46.2 received.
2020-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Lonnie Rarden
Lonnie Rarden — Petitioner