No. 19-7628
Glen Gary Guyn v. Jason Kent, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment cause-and-prejudice comity due-process finality fourth-amendment fundamental-injustice incarceration search-and-seizure unreasonable-search unreasonable-search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Guyn's Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures was violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Whether Mr. Guyn’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures was violated. 2.) Whether the principles of comity and finality that inform the concepts of cause and prejudice must yield to the imperative of correcting a fundamentally unjust incarceration. 3.) Whether the continued incarceration of Mr. Guyn would be a violation of his Rights to Due Process of Law from the errors committed.
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent Jason Kent to respond filed.
2020-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Jason Kent
Matthew Caplan — District Attorney, 22nd Judicial District, Respondent
Matthew Caplan — District Attorney, 22nd Judicial District, Respondent