Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED / ‘ , 2 OY) érvt-dite os Yo cnet rts rag |) 2014. Tren Arata? 26,2019 Lm Porras Gh a Beernnenps qedgiqert "at The. tnd Dot Aeeorg = | ray, , ALnf da, 2217 1 Pete 1) PT et, 2019 fom Dem harass Tin PNG OI aunt Ci inn ne ee galls! Geeta rts Pim Wh wee givin TA quickys ag ag Meret te aesneiad 9 OES OT a Pate Clot ’ Lb dtas Ypurt Trey A ae OO ore Sg ne 1 et OT ap, Tt Te Pua Spurn eae & “A fan bose Whey wee, Clee) te to ee on mn e dace aed : byt Do OE Sie bef chem ET ss 1s Mes ) “ ar mao, T+ Sa Lyd PP Nua beh eon Tree come tee PE