Whether the petitioner's conviction was unconstitutional under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Z . on vepues™ % fave The pleeot hy, case, of cose tH REI Shey ent Me, wld of | Wh fla wehbe? 7 OOK a a. eer @Q?zsr 7 car gees a yploled Ths convictton Boo gyottod ae G rh arenciinent 6¢ he USL cont len anid awersed o guise. pervation hy ~ uke hel arwend vital o wvelwent "gan a peten really sgn away the US conshitn guuricteeA “ikl, and $o CONSEGENEES, awking haf ans hilTion val no eles” pe Ary ? a ? Zo hs cor 000g % yptelel oO conviction ct Mc, The? deh lec! anrewtnent M1. Us enlfitthin, Hed in tedcle parF te a Z pegere J sey right, as well af a person's ate. Aavern a protection tn respon! wow Phypee! threw of fate ejanst As fhenuly lA oto-cly bree. ? C ated Sta les Mor Stete. hol assvine “ly lhe bf te Phe Lye. 07 any slave ; jt al/ such ats, ablggtions and clu shelf be. hold Megal and vera .). J Qa t clea, that ever te nen U yood ot @ (7 yeor ferdente y Sorhea Lolerr por revel he coerted ple agree reat m The abe referened case rnlhhed ? Z