Whether the jury instruction that 'the law presumes that a person intends the ordinary consequences of his voluntary acts' violates the Fourteenth Amendment's requirement that the State prove every element of a criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. In an action in which the sole claim is whether,in a case in which intent is an element of the crime convicted of,the jury instruction, "the law presumes that a person intends the ordinary consequences of . his voluntary acts," violates the Fourteenth Amendment's requirement that the State prove every element of a criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt? Answer of the court below: No,the appeal is without arguable merit.