Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus and denying a certificate of appealability

No question identified. : ' . : QUESTIGN(S) PRESENTED I. WAS TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE QRTATMEN FROM HARRTS'S HOTEL ROOM? II. WAS TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO CONDUCT A PROPER PRETRIAL INVESTIGATION AND TN CHALLENGE THE FALSE EVID~ : ENCE USED TO BIND HARRIS GVER FOR TAIAL? ; TIT. WAS TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FAR ALLOWING A RETIRED POLICE : DETECTIVE TO SERVE AS A JUROR DESPITE HARRIS'S DISAGREEMENT? . Iv. WAS TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO CHALLENGE A PoTENTIAL JUROR'S STATEMENT THAT SHE DID NOT THINK SHE COULD BE IMPARTIAL? V. WAS TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE WHEN HE VIGLATED PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO RECEIVE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BY ALLOWING THE WITNESS CLEVELAND HURD TO LIE UNDER OATH DURING CRASS~ EXAMINATION? . I y * , ; LIST NF PARTIES {X] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the caver page. A list of all