No. 19-7643

In Re Stephen Daniel Leonard

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-02-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment administrative-hearing administrative-procedure article-iv compulsory-process constitutional-rights disciplinary-proceeding disciplinary-proceedings due-process equal-protection judicial-proceedings liberty liberty-interest privileges-and-immunities witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the State of Florida violate Petitioner's protected rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.) Did the State of Florida violate Petitioner’s protected rights to Judicial Proceedings under Article IV, Section 1, and Amendment 6; of the United States Constitution when failing to allow Petitioner to call witnesses in his defense at an administrative disciplinary proceeding? 2.) Did the State of Florida deprive Petitioner of privileges and immunities of Citizens: Article IV; Section 2; Clause 1; of the United States Constitution, when denying Petitioner, an exiled ; former American Citizen, a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor during State administrative disciplinary proceeding? 3.) Did the State of Florida violate the Supreme Law of the Land Clause: Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, . when State disciplinary hearing team and warden allowed a disciplinary findings and actions to stand knowing prisoner did not get a right to call witness at prisoner’s disciplinary hearing that prisoner requested be present? See also Amendment 14, Section 2, Amendment 6, U.S. Const. ; 4.) Did the State of Florida deprive Petitioner of liberty without due ; process of law and equal protection of the laws, Amendment XIV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, when placing Petitioner in a Special Housing Unit (SHU) disciplinary confinement and taking incentive gain time good award credits upon State Correctional officers false report(s) and unfair disciplinary administrative hearing(s) in violation of State’s Administrative Code Rules of Conduct? 5.) Did the State of Florida violate Petitioner’s right to liberty: Amendment XIV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, when taking incentive gain time good award credits by using false report(s) and unfair State administrative disciplinary proceeding(s)? 6.) Is the Petitioner entitled to restoration of incentive gain time good award credits of 150 days which would entitle Petitioner to immediate release? ili : Zq

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-01-09
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Stephen Leonard
Stephen D. Leonard — Petitioner
Stephen D. Leonard — Petitioner