Whether the unduly suggestive pretrial identification procedure and resulting unreliable identifications admitted against White at his criminal trial violated White's right to due process?

QUESTION PRESENTED (1) Whether the unduly suggestive pretrial identification procedure and resulting unreliable identifications admitted against White at his criminal trial violated White’s right to due process? (2) Whether White’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by his trial counsel’s failure to effectively challenge the eyewitness identifications admitted to prove White’s guilt? i PARTIES AND LIST OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS The parties to this proceeding are Petitioner Craig Keyon White and Respondent Robert W. Fox, Warden of California Men’s Colony in San Luis Obispo, California. The California Attorney General Represents Respondent. White was convicted in Riverside County Superior Court in People v. White, case no. RIF10004243, Judge Michael B. Donner, presiding, in 2011. The reporter’s transcript of trial can be found at district court docket no. 14, lodgment 1. The California Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment on appeal in People v. White, No. E055529, on August 28, 2013 in an unpublished opinion. Petitioner’s