No. 19-7662
Juan Orellana v. Raymond Madden, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 5th-amendment-violation admissibility-of-statement criminal-procedure criminal-trial custodial-interrogation due-process evidence-admission fifth-amendment obstruction right-to-counsel unambiguous-request
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Orellana's Fifth Amendment right to counsel was violated when, in the course of custodial interrogation, the detective obstructed Orellana's unambiguous attempts to request counsel and his ensuing custodial statement was admitted against him at his criminal trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Orellana's Fifth Amendment right to counsel was violated
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent Raymond Madden, Warden to respond filed.
2020-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Juan Orellana
Tracy Casadio — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Raymond Madden, Warden
David W. Williams — California Department of Justice, Respondent