Whether Orellana's Fifth Amendment right to counsel was violated

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Orellana’s Fifth Amendment right to counsel was violated when, in the course of custodial interrogation, the detective obstructed Orellana’s unambiguous attempts to request counsel and his ensuing custodial statement was admitted against him at his criminal trial? i PARTIES AND LIST OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS The parties to this proceeding are Petitioner Juan Orellana and Respondent Raymond Madden, Warden of California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, California. The California Attorney General Represents Respondent. Orellana was convicted in Los Angeles County Superior Court in People v. Orellana, case no. BA403082, Judge Lisa B. Lench, presiding, in 2014. The reporter’s transcript of trial can be found at district court docket no. 10, lodgment 7. The California Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment on appeal in People v. Orellana, No. B255892, on April 30, 2015 in an unpublished opinion. Petitioner’s