No. 19-7677
Sandchase Cody v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-U.S.C.-2255 28-usc-2255 acca district-court due-process resentencing resentencing-hearing sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Cody was denied due process when after the removal of his unlawful ACCA sentencing enhancement, following a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court denied his request for a resentencing hearing
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Mr. Cody was denied due process when after the removal of his unlawful ACCA sentencing enhancement, following a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court denied his request for a resentencing hearing. i
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Sandchase Cody
Michelle Rachel Yard — Federal Defender Office, Petitioner
Michelle Rachel Yard — Federal Defender Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent