No. 19-768
Sherard Martin v. Davis Marinez, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: attorneys-fees civil-damages civil-rights constitutional-rights damages due-process economic-loss exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment illegal-search illegal-stop incarceration police-misconduct standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plaintiff whose fourth amendment rights have been violated may be automatically denied damages for subsequent incarceration, attorneys fees, or economic loss, merely because the police discover contraband as the result of the illegal stop?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: Whether a plaintiff whose fourth amendment rights have been violated may be automatically denied damages for subsequent incarceration, attorneys fees, or economic loss, merely because the police discover contraband as the result of the illegal stop?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-12-24
Waiver of right of respondents Davis Marinez, et al. to respond filed.
2019-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Davis Marinez, et al.
Benna Ruth Solomon — Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Respondent
Benna Ruth Solomon — Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Respondent
Sherard Martin
Stephen Louis Richards — Law Office of Stephen L. Richards, Petitioner
Stephen Louis Richards — Law Office of Stephen L. Richards, Petitioner