No. 19-7680
Tags: appellate-review capital-punishment constitutional-law criminal-procedure death-penalty death-penalty-sentencing due-process hurst-v-florida judicial-precedent retroactivity sentencing sentencing-procedure sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Punishment HabeasCorpus
Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether appellate reweighing is constitutional after Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether appellate reweighing is constitutional after Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016). 2. Whether Hurst is retroactive. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI — Page i
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-13
Brief of respondent State of Nevada in opposition filed.
2020-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 16, 2020)
2019-12-11
Application (19A650) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 17, 2020.
2019-12-05
Application (19A650) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 19, 2019 to February 17, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Samuel Howard
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner
State of Nevada