Whether the arbitrary denial of an evidentiary hearing on a petition for writ of habeas corpus deprives the petitioner of due process

No question identified. : AUESTIAN Us) PeesewreD tb. Ts te net vena ana summary dansal Custshaut issuance ofan Onder ta show anuse Savidantiary haaring) ata garition Pana work of habeas carpus utherein he aay an e. ~ * Masanved Sacvs include 2 Maclen Blacher 5 hareinatter Patitener yt arbitrarily degeived a& Aafoult Judgman’ 5 Petitioner fs de peived af resentencing autside the haunds af the Stigulations sax ly +0 Stotute Upon ushich such resentencing fests 5 Tatitiones is dageived of the fight +o appeal sak ly said staste } the courts aobitraciiy daclina to tile and hear easas Joouses beavght ap the. Petitioner, and na adnan“ Unjuscr fitcumstances Aerailed hy aaid paritian Chee AMPENDIK €3q.)y is Inaggroge late.» ungust gand dogrive the Datitioner at due process of law? a. Ts Th ask toue that the. aforesaid QraSanved fects (Soe. nD) Lda cr @n 4S j < q (sSuance. ofan order to Shous car So Jautdent an haacing = 4, “Xs Th not trua Anat tho afarensaid presanted. Facts (See. 7d.) avidence/ Qvinea. tha fe duc te tha PorttHones % 4. Ta tk nak true. thax the bedacs at WSue. here Csoa APTEN DEX ASB.) wktiecls {ssue Peano Courts Ther neither Cal.'s Lanse y nar any Pasitively Cnacked Storuke. ot tha Arohe g ManttanN Goa null fuald gasa motter af dorttive Vous » and prherefore,y nob \austully binding Ugan / enforceable against tle Qa onae . S$. Ls Tr ast voue trek Wlhete. Caurts AF the Stabe unjust fahly Fail as $\0 fhean tases/tauses Beaushy by the Vatibtoner then no actual and Valid means SH VecaurSe and fewedy ate available pat Fhe. SNero \evol, ts the VWditTaner and thetefore Peleral Common— las /other Pemedy Ts Ava te the Port etoner 2