No. 19-7685
Dominic Lindsey v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure factual-determination factual-errors federal-rule-criminal-procedure federal-rules federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-error plain-error plain-error-review precedent sentencing standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does plain-error review under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) include factual errors?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does plain-error review under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) include factual errors? (i)
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-05-26
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Davis</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 589 U. S. ___ (2020) (<i>per curiam</i>).
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-17
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-03-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 20, 2020.
2020-03-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 19, 2020 to April 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 19, 2020)
2020-01-06
Application (19A637) to extend further the time from January 16, 2020 to February 15, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
2020-01-06
Application (19A637) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 15, 2020.
2019-12-09
Application (19A637) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 16, 2020.
2019-12-06
Application (19A637) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 17, 2019 to January 16, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent