Whether the issues and evidence related to a juvenile offender's decertification (transfer) decision are relevant to the juvenile offender's resentencing

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVtEW QUE? 1 FO No 0S ee The fact $, isswes,and ewdence celated to a suvemle Lifer’s Decergif€ jcation (Transfer) decision are relevant fo said Juvenile Liters Resentencang . The decertif ication Cranster) decision presents the Sentencing option of light sentence asa Iuvenile and an ont Rg ely long sentence As an adult, see, Miller v. Alabama, /32 sictp AYSS (2018)5 Alley nev Si {33 sicts Aalst @e1d): Corm Vi Munday,7£A.34 bbl (es, Super 2013), LNG SU PPORTED DECERTIF IC ATION be nad’. Nowy VEWTLE Ge EL. PETETLONER'S SENTENCE KNO CONVICTION UNCONSTLTKTLONADL SENCE, RAETER AGSEARS, VEN Ze § d NG Fe et WSTHENG Su@PoRTEP HES DECERTL FICATION DENFAL FT a, DID Cour Ks , PE ONER T0 MAKE DLAGNosts APPOINTED SCECLALEST WASN'T QUALT eb To Po, THUS FTI G hk TION PETLTLOWE R'S POSSEGLE AND/oR ACTUAL REHABILLTATIVE NEEDS? 3. DID CouRT ERR/ABuSE PTS AT Su L1CER RESENTENC ENG HERRING SE eRe Trane Brit TRON ER To KDDRESS/CoRRECT FALSE AND MISLEADING DOCUMENTS/AVER MENTS , MADE AGCRENST PETETIONER BY PETETEONER'S KTTORNE VT AND PROSECUTION IN THETR SENTENCENG MEMORANDUM S ? 4, DAD METEGATION SPECEALEST ERE RND PRE Ju Diee peTaTTOW ER BY PROYLPING ZMEO PL PLETE EVALUATION AND REcoRT WETH FALSE/MESLERD ENG INFORMAT TON AND GivENe UNDER MENING WERK TESTENONY FT Ke DLD CouRT REPORTE, HE.COW USE 0 tNG cc RESEWTENCING REARLTVG TRANSCRFP FPR CE BZ ET HON if G, DED EVEPENCE Su? RT A SEVTENCE OR. CONVECT TON ON FELOMY MURPER, ROBBERY AND © CONSPERACY TO ROBGERYT Ci)