No. 19-7718
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2a 8-usc-1324a aiding-and-abetting criminal-intent immigration-law mens-rea recklessness rosemond-v-united-states statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the intent element of 18 U.S.C. § 2(a) can, consistent with this Court's decision in Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2014), be satisfied by a mens rea of recklessness in a prosecution for aiding and abetting a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the intent element of 18 U.S.C. § 2(a) can, consistent with this Court’s decision in Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2014), be satisfied by a mens rea of recklessness in a prosecution for aiding and abetting a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a). Whether, and to what extent, an aider and abettor must know the facts that make up the elements of the principal offense in advance of the crime. [i]
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Denny Reyes
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent