No. 19-7719

Adam Christopher Sheafe v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circumvent-obligations circumvention criminal-procedure detainer federal-government federal-state-relations federal-transfer habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-ad-prosequendum interstate-agreement-on-detainers judicial-discretion purpose-of-iad state-filed-detainer violate-purpose writ-of-habeas-corpus-ad-prosequendum
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Interstate Agreement on Detainers applies when the State, in which the federal district sits, filed a detainer and the federal government obtained the Petitioner's presence pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, and whether the writ allowed the government to circumvent the obligations that the IAD imposes and violate the purpose of the IAD?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Interstate Agreement on Detainers applies when the State, in which the federal district sits, filed a detainer and the federal government obtained the Petitioner’s presence pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, and whether the writ allowed the government to circumvent the obligations that the IAD imposes and violate the purpose of the IAD? 2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion in holding that, if the Interstate Agreement on Detainers did apply, such agreement was not violated as good cause existed for three continuances beyond the 120-day deadline? ii

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Adam Sheafe
Stephanie Kathryn BondAttorney at Law, Petitioner
Stephanie Kathryn BondAttorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent