Whether the petitioner's statutory rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Montgomery County, MD Code of Human Rights were unlawfully denied by the federal court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The FeLERAL COUT IN €RLEWBEL], MID AND THE FOUKT A CIRCUIT COURT LV RICHMOND V4, DEIMED /9Y STATUTORY RICHIS ASSERTED UNDER beth TITLE Vil o€ HE CI. RIGHTS AT OF 1964 AND THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY , IAD COLE OF fYMAN RIGHTS, AFTER | FLED VALID CHARBES AeAINST BLOOM NEDALELS / PACYS with the EEL on APRIL Ab, ROG, MESE CHARGES SPECINED KAC/4L DBCRININATION , a quidenanice OF the. PERVASIVE HOSTILE WORK ENVIROMENT, VITERANCE OF PUBLIC SLANDER FEAINUISTO INE BYTHE COMPAN'S DEPARTMENT, MANAGER , RETALIATION AeAINST INE WH FALSE ACCUSATIONS OF MisconD UT” A PHYSICAL ASSAULT by 4 SECOND DEPARTMENT ypypGeR COERCION by BLOOMINGD AES STORE MANAGEMENT AIS HE REGIONAL HUMAN RESOVRCER MAN AEE 40 CON CCEIe (NY SATUTORY RICHTS , ¢ SIXTT FOUR DAYS AFTER NY CHAREES ATH THE EEOC HERE FILED , BLOOMINGDALES [MACS EXECUTED & LETALIATOR { TERMINATION, AEAINST mE, THIS, TERMINATION WAS WELL WITHIN THE TénporAL, PROXIMIT OPIN PROTECTED ACTIVITY RIGHTS OF TITLE V1/ of Tuo. Ci, | RIGHTS Bcf oF 1964 ag Hell a fe MONTGOMERY COUNT? Mb, COE OF HUNAN RIEHTS (B¢stD ON 4 FORK AL, WELTER AO&H SIFRING BEREEMENT BITY THE EEOC ). TS. RETALIATORY FERMINATION was VELAWEUL Aso RSH ITED VIOLATION OF /?4 AESERTED F9AIVTORY RIGHTS .