No. 19-7752
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation custody due-process eleventh-circuit fifth-amendment miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona pre-miranda-questioning public-safety-exception self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Ochoa's Fifth Amendment rights were violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether Mr. Ochoa’s Fifth Amendment rights were violated when the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that the to this Court’s general rule in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 460-61 (1966) justitied pre-Miranda questioning of Mr. Ochoa who was in custody when he was questioned? i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2020)
2020-01-22
Application (19A811) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 22, 2020.
2020-01-16
Application (19A811) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Daniel Ochoa
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent