No. 19-7757
Babatunde Popoola v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bank-fraud consent criminal-law criminal-procedure financial-crimes identity-theft money-laundering predicate-crime statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a person who with the consent of a bank account holder provides identifying information to a third party to deposit funds into the account where the predicate crime has been completed and the act of depositing proceeds of the alleged crime is not a crime enumerated in the statute
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER A PERSON WHO WITH THE CONSENT OF A BANK ACCOUNT HOLDER PROVIDES IDENTIFYING INFORMATION TO A THIRD PARTY TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO THE ACCOUNT WHERE THE PREDICATE CRIME HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE ACT OF DEPOSITING PROCEEDS OF THE ALLEGED CRIME IS NOT A CRIME ENUMERATED IN THE STATUTE. 1
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-03-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2020)
Attorneys
Babatunde Popoola
John O. Iweanoge — The Iweanoges Firm, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent