No. 19-7766
Guillermo Garcia v. B. A. Lacey, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: california-law categorical-approach civil-procedure civil-rights due-process legal-enforcement standing statutory-interpretation vagueness vexatious-litigant void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether California's vexatious litigant statute, in key provisions, utilizes the categorical approach, requiring guesswork and inviting arbitrary enforcement, and should be declare void for vagueness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED . Whether California’s vexatious litigant statute, in key provisions, utilizes the categorical approach, requiring guesswork and inviting arbitrary enforcement, and should be declare void for vagueness. i
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent B. A. Lacey, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
Attorneys
B. A. Lacey, et al.
Guillermo Garcia
Guillermo Garcia — Petitioner