Whether the pre-trial acts and omissions made by Marcus Williams' counsel constituted ineffective assistance of counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . ae (1) . WHETHER THE PRE-TRIAL ACTS AND OMISSIONS MADE BY MARCUS WILLIAMS’ COUNSEL, ALLIED WITH FAILURE TO OBJECT ON THE RECORD, TO PRE-ARRAIGNMENT ERRORS MADE BY THE DISTRICT COURT, FAILURE TO SUBJECT THE GOVERNMENT'S CASE TO STRICT ADVERSARIAL TESTING AND APPELLATE COUNSEL'S DERELICTION IN RAISING COGNIZABLE APPELLATE ISSUES, CONSTITUTED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, BORDERING ON CONSTRUCTIVE DENIAL OF COUNSEL, A STRUCTURAL ERROR. (2) CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND RULE 11 VIOLATIONS MAY HAVE RENDERED MARCUS WILLIAMS PLEA AGREEMENT INVOLUNTARY, UNKNOWING OWING AND UNINTELLIGENTLY MADE, BY R EASON OF DECEPTION PERPETUATED BY COUNSEL AND FAILURE E OF THE COURT, THE GOVERNMENT, COUNSEL, TO ENDURE PETITIONER WAS ENTITLED TO RELIEF. : : : i: