Whether Petitioner's sentence on the second § 924(c) conviction and twenty-five year sentence enhancement was incorrectly affirmed

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner Mickel L. Marzouk presents two questions for this Court’s review: 1. Whether Petitioner’s sentence on the second § 924(c) conviction and twenty-five year sentence enhancement was incorrectly affirmed in the Fourth Circuit in light of the Fair Sentencing Acts’ clarification that the twenty-five year enhancement only applies to those who have previously been convicted and served a sentence for such an offense? 2. Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a) can serve as a predicate crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)?