No. 19-7777
John Henry Hoyle v. West Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-conviction due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction question-not-identified sexual-offender-registration standing statutory-interpretation takings telephone-disclosure void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
Question Presented (from Petition)
ESTION PRESENTED Is West Virginia's sexual offender registration scheme, which requires the disclosure of any telephone number that a registrant “has” or “uses,” unconstitutionally void for vagueness, so as to require the reversal of the Petitioner's convictions? ii
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent State of West Virginia to respond filed.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)
Attorneys
John Henry Hoyle
Jeremy Benjamin Cooper — Blackwater Law PLLC, Petitioner
Jeremy Benjamin Cooper — Blackwater Law PLLC, Petitioner
State of West Virginia
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent