Whether Harper was denied effective assistance of counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW L A. Should certiorari be granted to determine whether Harper was denied the effective assistance of counsel for the failure to challenge on appeal and via a petition for certiorari the district court’s refusal to consider the statutorily mandated consecutive sentences for Harper’s 18 U.S.C. §924(c) convictions when fashioning the sentences for his predicate offense convictions in light of his similarly situated co-defendants obtaining relief after raising the same issue on appeal and in the Supreme Court due to the foreshadowing of this Court’s decision in Dean v. United States, 581 U.S. __, 187 S.Ct. 1170 (2017)? B. Should certiorari be granted to determine whether Dean v. United States, 581 U.S. _, 187 S.Ct. 1170 (2017), announced a new rule of rule retroactively applicable on collateral review? I. Should certiorari be granted to address whether a conviction for carjacking by “intimidation” qualifies as a predicate offense under the “force” or “elements” clause of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(A)? i LIST OF