No. 19-7783

Billy J. Martin v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection question-not-identified standing statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant statutory and constitutional provisions

Question Presented (from Petition)

ESTION(S) PRESETED If a Florida U.S. Citizen is convicted of a crime by and through the perpetration of fraud on the trial Judge, and the jury by the assistant state attorney's office intentionally and knowingly at trial introducing perjured testimony to obtain a convicion. Do these facts violate the petitioner's 14° Amendment rights to due precess of law ? When an entire Court ignore's a juror's decent from the verdict during polling of the jury, does this create a fundamental error and a violation of due process of law? 2 PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING [] All parties in the caption of the case on the cover page. [X] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all

Docket Entries

2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Inch to respond filed.
2020-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)

Attorneys

Billy Martin
Billy J. Martin — Petitioner
Billy J. Martin — Petitioner
Mark Inch
Wesley Heidt — Respondent
Wesley Heidt — Respondent