Did the district court properly grant Respondent's motion to dismiss Wolfs habeas petition as time-barred?

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the district court properly grant Respondent’s motion to dismiss Wolfs habeas petition as time-barred where Respondent conceded that Wolf was entitled to a substantial period of statutory tolling and the record shows that Wolf's petition was timely under other tolling theories or at least demonstrated that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing to further establish that his petition was timelyfiled? i PARTIES AND LIST OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS The parties to this proceeding are Petitioner Jacob Daniel Wolf and Respondent Suzanne M. Peery, Warden, Warden of California Correctional Center in Susanville, California.! The California Attorney General Represents Respondent. Wolf was convicted in Los Angeles County Superior Court following a nocontest plea in People v. Jacob Wolf, case no. PA080317, Judge David B. Gelfound, presiding, in 2014. An excerpt of the reporter’s transcript of trial can be found at district court docket no. 20, lodgment 2. The California Court of Appeal dismissed Wolfs appeal in People v. Jacob D. Wold, No. B261515, on April 29, 2015. Petitioner’s