No. 19-7802
Fernando Ramirez Noria v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alienage confrontation-clause crawford-precedent crawford-v-washington essential-element federal-rules-of-evidence Hearsay non-testifying-agents sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the admission of the non-testifying agents' reports of their interviews of the defendant to prove alienage, an essential element of the offense, violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation and the Federal Rules of Evidence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED |. Did the admission of the non-testifying agents’ reports of their interviews of the defendant to prove alienage, an essential element of the offense, violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation and the Federal Rules of Evidence. 1
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Fernando Ramirez Noria
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent