Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the lower court's decision

No question identified. : i 2 pacnnyy Hh 8 PONY 48 1 PONT 1 Huy yf refer Buy OGD 990K yoronomay yA Baye pa lpraq? PUG nvoyoiuroy/ /aatpay yf os000) gy gyprgo UL Preppeee D ate PAPE spobig area ypug remeny a] S001 8 by bax Ani avg ry FeovIay v sun PreuayOy fIMh paleo FM | "] wpa Payyopion awuop fg prorated , YR YAH Sry pycadard, 0 0 ronpalep fH Caeryfofe, /7ULL) 342° Buy LOY P3LY UN big pA MS UENO IW SDIN'S <porada S330 stim sun vigd a0 BYP AUG) CIV SIMA dM, BAN fay WO? muy SHY Wap Ayaperaghly papa 198 ‘6? /snbry Su tops uy OYA 4 WY Jeag SfoY Op, YIM P3pyul why [DIVO AG) JVOUI0/(94 WN A 2 20/0 [209 fy pyriryf nn vad. SEBO IS YI pasa) b BVYIIYL BMipaapyaes WYP) Hapso nad 0 Aran U. POA aanaryprle Yoiynd Lyyrernsnste [ VIDS ep FO <prawalayy pang sPIOHOU PYG [ashing] BUD sa E ' D : Q pPrrory pafopleo BY Wasp Pifmvegy OY A. poilgrp st YA Say) serbia porvorgnppsngy 9iff a poufrgoll ¥ #2 vipaybye hyoruug oy 1H! 29 sbonuy sronhiqury ray} aw SOM e , 3 sy hay re Favoged puadtetay 0 70 SSA AfpANOSEY f8 [VOYP gaysahga HY DYE I , Ayomonsee : [arvOH_ TOSI 50 Aynmuuey 3), 40 prapaprasedayely [OSOY PUSHY WHF | Q3.LN3Sa4ud (S)NOILSSNO :