1. timmury fell Belo Au obyectve Staward of ReasonableNess of a Competent A ttorney ou felony Cases?

2.s M TO HIS CONa RTS Ke HE as bECt T No BeNet O th emplayed lanayge

3D E N A ON h ((Coel ch the p s tt aC?

4was Hlman Consttunal Rig Violate Kien he outs dey Holloan motion To A y o 20 wee Hele wias No Common scheme or plan and las weeks apaRt.

s ol At o c H Hyc epd S U

6 AS HollmN COnNal Ris VoatE Nen a MotNT SHKE tR CaSO A was Not Resowed in H favoR of he AcusEd?

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the lower court's decision